Canada 1979
For those of us who have enjoyed French’s masterful Mercer Trilogy (Leaving Home, Of the Fields, Lately and Salt-Water Moon) Jitters is a very special and deeply funny inside look. In one of the greatest of all “back-stage” comedies, French takes inspiration from the nerves and screw-ups of his own harrowing opening nights.
Directed by Ted Dykstra
Featuring Kevin Bundy, Diane D'Aquila, Oliver Dennis, C. David Johnson, Abena Malika, Noah Reid, Mike Ross, Jordan Pettle, and Sarah Wilson.
Running Time: 2 hours 30 minutes, with two 15 minute intermissions.
Download a digital copy of the playbill: Click Here >>
Please note: Promo codes and discounts are not valid for the added performances of Jitters from July 26 – 31.
by Soulpepper Associate Artist Paula Wing
The entry for Jitters in the Canadian Theatre Encyclopedia lists the cast of the original production and fully three members of that first gang of farceurs have graced the Soulpepper stage: David Calderisi (Nathan the Wise, 2004), Charmion King (The Maids, 2002, and Three Sisters, 2007), and Miles Potter (director, Awake and Sing, 2009). The play premiered more than thirty years ago in 1979, and if you count David French (and why wouldn't you?) that's four people who have made a life in the theatre in this country. Four people who are still working!
While it remains a demanding life that requires great resourcefulness, there is no question today that one can survive, and even thrive in Canada as an artist. For our early pioneers – people like Charmion King – to choose that life was an act of crazy optimism. In her day that choice required, as Ntozake Shange so memorably put it: an unfathomable commitment to a cosmic whimsy.
Jitters examines the nearly insane dedication and forbearance needed for a small theatre company to produce a new play. It gazes unflinchingly at all the impediments, from egos to finances, that stand in the way of reaching opening night and beyond that, of living through the run. The play is a raucous comedy but as with any comedy worth its salt, its concerns are deadly serious. In the midst of its comic catastrophes, David French considers the state of Canadian culture, and the lives of its frontline practitioners. He never forgets that these are real people with hopes and longings, so they never descend into caricature. They are always trying their hardest in a difficult situation, and because the writer never looks down on them, we never do either. This play has lasted because its humour comes from the characters rather than from the jokes.
That humanity comes directly from life: Jitters was inspired – at least in part – by David French's earliest experiences as an aspiring playwright at the then-fledgling Tarragon Theatre. Now, he breezily describes the process of bringing his first play (Leaving Home) to the stage as "the most cathartic experience of my life." At the time it must have felt cataclysmic.
Mind you, not all the things that go wrong in this production of the play-within-a-play happen on every professional show. Not even half of those things regularly occur. But all of us who work in the theatre have at least one story of a train wreck production in which we helplessly participated. Give us a couple of drinks and we'll tell you all about it. Jitters may have autobiographical roots, but it seems clear that David French listened at the bar when those war stories were being told and filed away the most awful bits to use for his own comic purposes in this play.
The juicy pleasure of Jitters is watching a collection of volatile elements collide. So long as you don't have to live through it yourself, there is nothing more wonderful than watching a group of people behave really badly, and nothing more entertaining than standing by as everything that can go wrong – for those other people – does go wrong. So buckle your seat belts: it's going to be a bumpy night.
1939 – David Benson French is born on January 18th in the small outport of Coley's Point, Newfoundland – the middle child of five boys.
1940 – His father Garfield joins the Eastern Command in Canada during the war, which separates him from his family.
2009 – All five Mercer plays are seen in rep at Gros Morne Theatre Festival in Newfoundland in July and August.
Critic Clive Barnes said of it: "Jitters is the happiest case of stage fright I have ever encountered."
New York Times critic Mel Gussow said: "Jitters is an almost perfect comedy of its kind."
Diane D'Aquila takes time out of rehearsals for Jitters to talk about the writing of David French, the legacy of Canadian playwrights, and why (hundreds of productions later) Jitters is one of the most produced Canadian plays of all time.
Soulpepper: This is your third play at Soulpepper and your third David French play. What is it about David’s characters that draws you to his writing?
Diane D'Aquila: Well, he is a national treasure, and I think the theatre in Canada is just beginning to realize that we have Canadian classics that exist. Because I started off in the early seventies in Canada when these playwrights – of which one of them was David French – were beginning to write, I grew up with these writers and I did many of those plays. Unfortunately when I was younger I never did a David French play, because I was always at the Toronto Free Theatre – I wasn’t over with Bill Glassco at Tarragon where they were premiering. But I certainly saw them, and they are classics. To see these plays remounted, because not only do we have David French, we have James Reaney, we’ve got early George F. Walker, Soulpepper is doing Doc in the summer and Sharron Pollock is a fantastic playwright. It’s time to bring it back.
SP: It seems like there is a whole generation that has never seen some of these Canadian classics on stage before.
DD: It’s wild. Because these plays are Canadian, they tend to be discarded. But now that some of these plays are way past the 30 year mark, like an antique, people are looking at them again and thinking they might be worth something. Now people are starting to look at these plays and realize that they’re fantastic.
SP: I know for Jitters, David French drew on his experiences from his own early opening nights. Has he discussed that at all in rehearsal?
DD: Not yet, but I remember him talking about it when we did Leaving Home. I certainly knew or have acted with many of the actors that these characters were based on – because in his mind he did have images for all of these men and women. And that’s kind of exciting that I actually knew them and worked with all of them. So that’s kind of fun, and I have my own image now of a character like Jessica Logan who I play in Jitters. I was talking with my daughter who herself just graduated from the University of Windsor in the Drama department and she made me laugh because she said, “Mom, you don’t need an image; you are Jessica Logan – you’re that age now. We all look at you a think ‘oh there’s that diva middle-aged actress.’” (Laughter) So I guess I don’t need an image - I’ll just be myself!
SP: Do you think that there is a reason that this play in particular keeps being revived?
DD: Well, we all like a comedy and in this day and age we certainly want to laugh and be entertained – that’s important. But also I think what’s lovely is if you have a huge love of theatre, if you really, really adore theatre, it is a very good, spot on the money backstage look of theatre – the vulnerabilities of actors, how difficult it is to produce anything, it’s a wonder anything ever gets accomplished. I think when we sit out front in the audience, if the actors and the director have done their jobs right then they make it look easy – everything just looks like they threw it together. We go 'isn’t that fantastic, how easy it is?' Well in actual fact it’s nearly impossible to get that effortless look going. How many times have I been in a show where, as in Jitters, we almost don’t have an actor for opening night, an actor comes in hurt or sick, the chaos, the people wanting to quit – it happens all the time! So I think he’s very true but he does it in a loving way, he doesn’t send it up.
SP: As opposed to Noises Off, which is often compared to Jitters?
DD: Yes, I definitely prefer Jitters to Noises Off, which is very funny – it’s hysterical, but it doesn’t have the truth that Jitters has. There are moments in Jitters that aren’t funny, just very, very real and spot on. And I think audiences love that. It’s immediate, it’s real, and it’s very vulnerable. All these people you just fall in love with.